Credit Acceptance Operating Margin vs. Net Income
| CACC Stock | USD 495.53 5.64 1.15% |
Credit Acceptance Operating Profit Margin |
|
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.58 | 0.9875 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.36 | 0.1829 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.54 | 0.4763 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.23 | 0.244 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.0538 | 0.0442 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | 0.2782 |
|
|
For Credit Acceptance profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Credit Acceptance to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Credit Acceptance utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Credit Acceptance's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Credit Acceptance over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Check out Trending Equities. Will Consumer Finance sector continue expanding? Could Credit diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Credit Acceptance. Projected growth potential of Credit fundamentally drives upward valuation adjustments. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Credit Acceptance data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.10) | Earnings Share 36.36 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.016 | Return On Assets |
Understanding Credit Acceptance requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Credit's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what Credit Acceptance's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Credit Acceptance's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Credit Acceptance's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Credit Acceptance should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, Credit Acceptance's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.
Credit Acceptance Net Income vs. Operating Margin Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Credit Acceptance's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Credit Acceptance value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Credit Acceptance is rated below average in operating margin category among its peers. It also is rated below average in net income category among its peers making up about 908,486,927 of Net Income per Operating Margin. At present, Credit Acceptance's Operating Profit Margin is projected to slightly decrease based on the last few years of reporting. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Credit Acceptance's earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.Credit Net Income vs. Operating Margin
Operating Margin shows how much operating income a company makes on each dollar of sales. It is one of the profitability indicators which helps analysts to understand whether the firm is successful or not making money from everyday operations.
Credit Acceptance |
| = | 0.47 % |
A good Operating Margin is required for a company to be able to pay for its fixed costs or payout its debt, which implies that the higher the margin, the better. This ratio is most effective in evaluating the earning potential of a company over time when comparing it against a firm's competitors.
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Credit Acceptance |
| = | 423.9 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Credit Net Income Comparison
Credit Acceptance is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Credit Acceptance Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Credit Acceptance, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Credit Acceptance will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Credit Acceptance's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Credit Acceptance, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 1000 K | 1.1 M | |
| Operating Income | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 565.4 M | 315.9 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -538.3 M | -511.4 M | |
| Net Income | 423.9 M | 226.5 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 141.5 M | 90 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 616.2 M | 647 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 423.9 M | 452.2 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -8.5 M | -8.9 M | |
| Interest Income | 27.5 M | 53 M | |
| Net Interest Income | 27.5 M | 28.9 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 587.1 M | 616.4 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 38.26 | 40.18 | |
| Income Quality | 2.49 | 3.15 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.75 | 0.56 |
Credit Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Credit Acceptance. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Credit Acceptance position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Credit Acceptance's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Credit Acceptance Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Credit Acceptance's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Credit Acceptance is estimated to be 11.655 with the future projection ranging from a low of 11.37 to a high of 11.94. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Credit Acceptance is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
11.37 Lowest | Expected EPS | 11.94 Highest |
Credit Acceptance Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Credit Acceptance's value are higher than the current market price of the Credit Acceptance stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Credit Acceptance is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Credit Acceptance's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of June 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 3 | 76.31% | 0.0 | 11.655 | 36.36 |
Credit Acceptance Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Credit Acceptance refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Credit Acceptance predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Credit Acceptance, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Credit Acceptance Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Credit Acceptance, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Credit Acceptance should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Credit Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Credit Acceptance's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2026-01-29 | 2025-12-31 | 10.01 | 11.35 | 1.34 | 13 | ||
2025-10-29 | 2025-09-30 | 9.52 | 10.28 | 0.76 | 7 | ||
2025-07-31 | 2025-06-30 | 9.83 | 8.56 | -1.27 | 12 | ||
2025-04-30 | 2025-03-31 | 9.67 | 9.35 | -0.32 | 3 | ||
2025-01-30 | 2024-12-31 | 7.93 | 10.17 | 2.24 | 28 | ||
2024-10-30 | 2024-09-30 | 9.05 | 8.79 | -0.26 | 2 | ||
2024-07-31 | 2024-06-30 | 8.91 | 10.29 | 1.38 | 15 | ||
2024-04-30 | 2024-03-31 | 8.35 | 9.28 | 0.93 | 11 | ||
2024-01-31 | 2023-12-31 | 5.43 | 7.29 | 1.86 | 34 | ||
2023-10-30 | 2023-09-30 | 5.71 | 5.43 | -0.28 | 4 | ||
2023-08-01 | 2023-06-30 | 8.18 | 1.69 | -6.49 | 79 | ||
2023-05-01 | 2023-03-31 | 8.81 | 7.61 | -1.2 | 13 | ||
2023-01-31 | 2022-12-31 | 7.16 | 9.58 | 2.42 | 33 | ||
2022-11-01 | 2022-09-30 | 10.33 | 6.49 | -3.84 | 37 | ||
2022-08-01 | 2022-06-30 | 12.89 | 7.94 | -4.95 | 38 | ||
2022-05-02 | 2022-03-31 | 12.37 | 14.94 | 2.57 | 20 | ||
2022-01-31 | 2021-12-31 | 12.69 | 14.6 | 1.91 | 15 | ||
2021-11-01 | 2021-09-30 | 12.02 | 15.79 | 3.77 | 31 | ||
2021-07-29 | 2021-06-30 | 10.36 | 17.18 | 6.82 | 65 | ||
2021-04-29 | 2021-03-31 | 7.92 | 11.82 | 3.9 | 49 | ||
2021-02-01 | 2020-12-31 | 7.21 | 9.43 | 2.22 | 30 | ||
2020-10-29 | 2020-09-30 | 5.69 | 13.56 | 7.87 | 138 | ||
2020-07-30 | 2020-06-30 | 4.84 | 5.4 | 0.56 | 11 | ||
2020-05-27 | 2020-03-31 | 3.68 | -4.61 | -8.29 | 225 | ||
2020-01-30 | 2019-12-31 | 8.85 | 8.6 | -0.25 | 2 | ||
2019-11-01 | 2019-09-30 | 8.95 | 8.73 | -0.22 | 2 | ||
2019-07-30 | 2019-06-30 | 8.46 | 8.68 | 0.22 | 2 | ||
2019-04-29 | 2019-03-31 | 7.87 | 8.65 | 0.78 | 9 | ||
2019-01-30 | 2018-12-31 | 7.29 | 7.79 | 0.5 | 6 | ||
2018-10-29 | 2018-09-30 | 6.9 | 7.75 | 0.85 | 12 | ||
2018-07-31 | 2018-06-30 | 6.52 | 7.75 | 1.23 | 18 | ||
2018-05-03 | 2018-03-31 | 6.19 | 6.17 | -0.02 | 0 | ||
2018-01-30 | 2017-12-31 | 5.27 | 3.97 | -1.3 | 24 | ||
2017-10-30 | 2017-09-30 | 4.99 | 5.19 | 0.2 | 4 | ||
2017-07-31 | 2017-06-30 | 4.67 | 5.09 | 0.42 | 8 | ||
2017-05-01 | 2017-03-31 | 4.37 | 4.72 | 0.35 | 8 | ||
2017-01-31 | 2016-12-31 | 4.26 | 4.33 | 0.07 | 1 | ||
2016-11-01 | 2016-09-30 | 4.15 | 4.21 | 0.06 | 1 | ||
2016-07-29 | 2016-06-30 | 3.86 | 4.38 | 0.52 | 13 | ||
2016-05-02 | 2016-03-31 | 3.81 | 3.63 | -0.18 | 4 | ||
2016-02-01 | 2015-12-31 | 3.75 | 3.84 | 0.09 | 2 | ||
2015-10-29 | 2015-09-30 | 3.69 | 3.53 | -0.16 | 4 | ||
2015-07-29 | 2015-06-30 | 3.53 | 3.54 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2015-04-29 | 2015-03-31 | 3.33 | 3.41 | 0.08 | 2 | ||
2015-01-29 | 2014-12-31 | 3.28 | 3.45 | 0.17 | 5 | ||
2014-10-29 | 2014-09-30 | 3.14 | 3.38 | 0.24 | 7 | ||
2014-07-30 | 2014-06-30 | 2.9 | 2.98 | 0.08 | 2 | ||
2014-04-29 | 2014-03-31 | 2.79 | 2.72 | -0.07 | 2 | ||
2014-01-30 | 2013-12-31 | 2.74 | 2.8 | 0.06 | 2 | ||
2013-10-30 | 2013-09-30 | 2.59 | 2.75 | 0.16 | 6 | ||
2013-07-30 | 2013-06-30 | 2.49 | 2.56 | 0.07 | 2 | ||
2013-04-30 | 2013-03-31 | 2.31 | 2.48 | 0.17 | 7 | ||
2013-01-31 | 2012-12-31 | 2.24 | 2.4 | 0.16 | 7 | ||
2012-11-01 | 2012-09-30 | 2.24 | 2.12 | -0.12 | 5 | ||
2012-08-02 | 2012-06-30 | 1.94 | 2.18 | 0.24 | 12 | ||
2012-05-02 | 2012-03-31 | 2.01 | 1.92 | -0.09 | 4 | ||
2012-02-02 | 2011-12-31 | 1.86 | 1.91 | 0.05 | 2 | ||
2011-11-01 | 2011-09-30 | 1.75 | 1.91 | 0.16 | 9 | ||
2011-08-01 | 2011-06-30 | 1.7 | 1.72 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2011-05-02 | 2011-03-31 | 1.54 | 1.57 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2011-02-02 | 2010-12-31 | 1.36 | 1.69 | 0.33 | 24 | ||
2010-11-01 | 2010-09-30 | 1.3 | 1.48 | 0.18 | 13 | ||
2010-08-03 | 2010-06-30 | 1.13 | 1.55 | 0.42 | 37 | ||
2010-04-29 | 2010-03-31 | 1.16 | 1.01 | -0.15 | 12 | ||
2010-02-04 | 2009-12-31 | 1.19 | 1.26 | 0.07 | 5 | ||
2005-03-24 | 2004-12-31 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 0.05 | 16 | ||
2004-11-01 | 2004-09-30 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.04 | 14 | ||
2004-08-04 | 2004-06-30 | 0.24 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 25 | ||
2004-05-14 | 2004-03-31 | 0.24 | 0.04 | -0.2 | 83 | ||
2004-01-28 | 2003-12-31 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 26 | ||
2003-11-14 | 2003-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 29 | ||
2003-08-05 | 2003-06-30 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 18 | ||
2003-04-24 | 2003-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.2 | 0.09 | 81 | ||
2003-01-31 | 2002-12-31 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-10-23 | 2002-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 15 | ||
2002-07-17 | 2002-06-30 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-04-17 | 2002-03-31 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2002-01-23 | 2001-12-31 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-10-18 | 2001-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2001-07-18 | 2001-06-30 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 12 | ||
2001-04-18 | 2001-03-31 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2001-01-25 | 2000-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.13 | -0.01 | 7 | ||
2000-10-18 | 2000-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-01-27 | 1999-12-31 | 0.13 | 0.1 | -0.03 | 23 | ||
1999-10-22 | 1999-09-30 | 0.12 | 0.07 | -0.05 | 41 | ||
1999-07-21 | 1999-06-30 | 0.11 | 0.1 | -0.01 | 9 | ||
1999-04-21 | 1999-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 9 | ||
1999-01-27 | 1998-12-31 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 57 | ||
1998-10-28 | 1998-09-30 | 0.1 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 20 | ||
1998-07-22 | 1998-06-30 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 14 | ||
1998-04-23 | 1998-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 36 | ||
1998-02-03 | 1997-12-31 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-10-22 | 1997-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.69 | 0.42 | 155 | ||
1997-07-24 | 1997-06-30 | 0.27 | 0.26 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
1997-04-24 | 1997-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-01-22 | 1996-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-10-16 | 1996-09-30 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-07-18 | 1996-06-30 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-04-17 | 1996-03-31 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-01-24 | 1995-12-31 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1995-10-18 | 1995-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1995-07-19 | 1995-06-30 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
1995-04-19 | 1995-03-31 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
1995-01-25 | 1994-12-31 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
1994-10-19 | 1994-09-30 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 27 | ||
1994-07-20 | 1994-06-30 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 33 | ||
1994-04-20 | 1994-03-31 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 11 | ||
1994-01-25 | 1993-12-31 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
1993-10-19 | 1993-09-30 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1993-07-20 | 1993-06-30 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 16 | ||
1993-01-26 | 1992-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 |
Use Credit Acceptance in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Credit Acceptance position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Credit Acceptance will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Credit Acceptance Pair Trading
Credit Acceptance Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Credit Acceptance could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Credit Acceptance when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Credit Acceptance - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Credit Acceptance to buy it.
The correlation of Credit Acceptance is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Credit Acceptance moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Credit Acceptance moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Credit Acceptance can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Credit Acceptance position
In addition to having Credit Acceptance in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Israel Wall Street Thematic Idea Now
Israel Wall Street
Cross-sector collection of best publicly traded Israel entities that are expected to continue growing. The Israel Wall Street theme has 73 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Israel Wall Street Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Trending Equities. For information on how to trade Credit Stock refer to our How to Trade Credit Stock guide.You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.
To fully project Credit Acceptance's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Credit Acceptance at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Credit Acceptance's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.