Arthur Competitors
| AJG Stock | USD 242.37 0.04 0.02% |
Arthur J vs MMC Old Correlation
Poor diversification
The correlation between Arthur J Gallagher and MMC is 0.63 (i.e., Poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Arthur J Gallagher and MMC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against Arthur Stock
The Arthur J's current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to increase to 0.07, while Return On Capital Employed is projected to decrease to 0.07. At this time, Arthur J's Non Currrent Assets Other are most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. The Arthur J's current Other Current Assets is estimated to increase to about 30.5 B, while Deferred Long Term Asset Charges is projected to decrease to roughly 592.3 M.Arthur J Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Arthur J and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Arthur and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Arthur J Gallagher does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Arthur Stock performing well and Arthur J Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Arthur J's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AON | 0.86 | 0.01 | (0.02) | 0.09 | 1.05 | 2.04 | 6.25 | |||
| TRV | 0.73 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.80 | 1.63 | 6.91 | |||
| HDB | 0.86 | (0.19) | 0.00 | (27.78) | 0.00 | 1.24 | 8.44 | |||
| SMFG | 1.14 | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.58 | 0.98 | 2.90 | 8.31 | |||
| MFC | 0.84 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.68 | 2.00 | 4.84 | |||
| AFL | 0.75 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.73 | 1.77 | 4.04 | |||
| WFC | 0.98 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 1.31 | 2.15 | 8.12 | |||
| PYPL | 1.41 | (0.48) | 0.00 | (0.26) | 0.00 | 2.25 | 8.51 | |||
| MMC | 0.94 | (0.19) | 0.00 | (0.94) | 0.00 | 1.97 | 9.33 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Arthur J Gallagher and related stocks such as Aon PLC, The Travelers Companies, and HDFC Bank Limited Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AON | 161 M | 979 M | 993 M | 1.1 B | 1.4 B | 1.4 B | 1.4 B | 1.2 B | 1.1 B | 1.5 B | 2 B | 1.3 B | 2.6 B | 2.6 B | 2.7 B | 3.1 B | 3.2 B |
| TRV | 45.4 M | 1.4 B | 2.5 B | 3.7 B | 3.7 B | 3.4 B | 3 B | 2.1 B | 2.5 B | 2.6 B | 2.7 B | 3.7 B | 2.8 B | 3 B | 5 B | 6.3 B | 6.6 B |
| HDB | 31.9 M | 49.8 B | 61.8 B | 79.3 B | 99.2 B | 117.9 B | 140.5 B | 178.5 B | 220.1 B | 260.3 B | 326 B | 386 B | 495.4 B | 622.7 B | 673.5 B | 774.5 B | 813.3 B |
| SMFG | 62.6 B | 518.5 B | 794.1 B | 766.4 B | 753.6 B | 646.7 B | 635.8 B | 734.4 B | 726.7 B | 703.9 B | 512.8 B | 706.6 B | 805.8 B | 962.9 B | 1.2 T | 1.4 T | 1.4 T |
| MFC | 704.5 M | 218 M | 1.7 B | 3.1 B | 3.5 B | 2.2 B | 3 B | 2.1 B | 4.7 B | 5.3 B | 5.3 B | 6.7 B | (2.1 B) | 5.5 B | 5.6 B | 6.5 B | 6.8 B |
| AFL | 54.2 M | 2 B | 2.9 B | 3.2 B | 3 B | 2.5 B | 2.7 B | 4.4 B | 2.9 B | 3.3 B | 4.8 B | 4.3 B | 4.4 B | 4.7 B | 5.4 B | 6.3 B | 6.6 B |
| WFC | 107.6 M | 15.9 B | 18.9 B | 21.9 B | 23.1 B | 22.9 B | 21.9 B | 22.2 B | 22.4 B | 19.7 B | 3.4 B | 22.1 B | 13.7 B | 19.1 B | 19.7 B | 21.3 B | 22.4 B |
| PYPL | 778 M | 778 M | 778 M | 955 M | 419 M | 1.2 B | 1.4 B | 1.8 B | 2.1 B | 2.5 B | 4.2 B | 4.2 B | 2.4 B | 4.2 B | 4.1 B | 4.8 B | 2.6 B |
Arthur J Gallagher and related stocks such as Aon PLC, The Travelers Companies, and HDFC Bank Limited Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Arthur J Gallagher financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Arthur J Gallagher operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Arthur J Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Arthur J competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Arthur J's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Arthur J's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Arthur J Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Arthur J Competition
Arthur J's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Arthur J Gallagher in relation to its competition. Arthur J's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Arthur J in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Arthur J's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Arthur J Gallagher, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Arthur J position
In addition to having Arthur J in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Monster Funds Thematic Idea Now
Monster Funds
Solid funds with above average long term performance indicators based on Macroaxis rating system. The Monster Funds theme has 32 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Monster Funds Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Arthur J Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.
Can Insurance Brokers industry sustain growth momentum? Does Arthur have expansion opportunities? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Arthur J. If investors know Arthur will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. Determining accurate worth demands scrutiny of both present operating results and projected expansion capacity. Evaluating Arthur J demands reviewing these metrics collectively while recognizing certain factors exert disproportionate influence.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.25) | Dividend Share 2.55 | Earnings Share 6.27 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.2 |
Understanding Arthur J Gallagher requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Arthur's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value—what Arthur J's is actually worth based on fundamentals—guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Market participants employ diverse analytical approaches to determine fair value and identify buying opportunities when prices dip below calculated worth. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Arthur J's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
Understanding that Arthur J's value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether Arthur J represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. In contrast, Arthur J's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.