PROG Competitors
| PRG Stock | USD 34.84 0.21 0.61% |
PROG Holdings vs Limbach Holdings Correlation
Poor diversification
The correlation between PROG Holdings and LMB is 0.77 (i.e., Poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PROG Holdings and LMB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against PROG Stock
| 0.82 | LX | Lexinfintech Holdings | PairCorr |
| 0.79 | PYPL | PayPal Holdings CDR | PairCorr |
| 0.46 | HYQ | Hypoport SE | PairCorr |
| 0.44 | HYQ | Hypoport SE | PairCorr |
| 0.43 | FINV | FinVolution Group Normal Trading | PairCorr |
PROG Holdings Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between PROG Holdings and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of PROG and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of PROG Holdings does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between PROG Stock performing well and PROG Holdings Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze PROG Holdings' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLFC | 2.28 | 0.72 | 0.29 | 0.63 | 2.04 | 5.67 | 11.05 | |||
| ALGT | 2.50 | 0.54 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 2.04 | 5.96 | 16.21 | |||
| GSL | 1.31 | 0.24 | 0.12 | 0.74 | 1.26 | 2.89 | 13.14 | |||
| HTZ | 2.87 | (0.52) | 0.00 | (0.13) | 0.00 | 7.09 | 16.82 | |||
| SLDP | 4.58 | (0.19) | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 7.14 | 72.11 | |||
| ECO | 1.86 | 0.41 | 0.13 | (1.08) | 2.02 | 4.38 | 15.37 | |||
| CTOS | 1.92 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 1.79 | 5.53 | 15.80 | |||
| BBSI | 1.51 | (0.27) | 0.00 | (0.17) | 0.00 | 2.17 | 14.16 | |||
| GIC | 0.97 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.71 | 2.67 | 5.63 | |||
| LMB | 2.46 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 2.99 | 4.34 | 14.34 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare PROG Holdings and related stocks such as Willis Lease Finance, Allegiant Travel, and Global Ship Lease Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLFC | 3.2 M | 14.5 M | 1.5 M | 15.6 M | 7.2 M | 7.4 M | 14.1 M | 62.2 M | 43.2 M | 66.9 M | 9.7 M | 3.4 M | 5.4 M | 43.8 M | 108.6 M | 124.9 M | 131.1 M |
| ALGT | (1.3 M) | 49.4 M | 78.6 M | 92.3 M | 86.7 M | 220.4 M | 219.6 M | 194.9 M | 161.8 M | 232.1 M | (184.1 M) | 151.9 M | 2.5 M | 117.6 M | (240.2 M) | (44.7 M) | (42.5 M) |
| GSL | 32.7 M | 9.1 M | 31.9 M | 32.5 M | 6.1 M | (28.9 M) | (65.1 M) | (74.3 M) | (57.4 M) | 39.8 M | 41.6 M | 171.5 M | 292.9 M | 304.5 M | 353.6 M | 406.7 M | 427 M |
| HTZ | 23.3 M | 176.2 M | 243.1 M | 302 M | (82 M) | 273 M | (491 M) | 327 M | (225 M) | (58 M) | (1.7 B) | 366 M | 2.1 B | 616 M | (2.9 B) | (2.6 B) | (2.4 B) |
| SLDP | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (14.4 M) | 18.1 M | (9.6 M) | (65.5 M) | (96.5 M) | (86.9 M) | (82.5 M) |
| ECO | (3 M) | (3 M) | (3 M) | (3 M) | (3 M) | (3 M) | (3 M) | (3 M) | (3 M) | 11.4 M | 101.3 M | (902.9 K) | 84.6 M | 145.3 M | 108.9 M | 125.2 M | 70.3 M |
| CTOS | (48 M) | (48 M) | (48 M) | (48 M) | (48 M) | (48 M) | (48 M) | (777.5 K) | 5.2 M | (27.1 M) | (21.3 M) | (181.5 M) | 38.9 M | 50.7 M | (28.7 M) | (33 M) | (34.6 M) |
| BBSI | 2.1 M | 14.3 M | 13.1 M | 17.9 M | (27.1 M) | 25.5 M | 18.8 M | 25.2 M | 38.1 M | 48.3 M | 33.8 M | 38.1 M | 47.3 M | 50.6 M | 53 M | 60.9 M | 64 M |
| GIC | 35.7 M | 54.4 M | (8.3 M) | (43.8 M) | (37.5 M) | (99.8 M) | (32.6 M) | 40.4 M | 224.7 M | 48.5 M | 65.4 M | 103.3 M | 78.8 M | 70.7 M | 61 M | 70.2 M | 73.7 M |
| LMB | (253 K) | (253 K) | (253 K) | (253 K) | (253 K) | (339.6 K) | 1.9 M | 712 K | (1.8 M) | (1.8 M) | 5.8 M | 6.7 M | 6.8 M | 20.8 M | 30.9 M | 35.5 M | 37.3 M |
PROG Holdings and related stocks such as Willis Lease Finance, Allegiant Travel, and Global Ship Lease Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in PROG Holdings financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of PROG Holdings operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.PROG Holdings Competitive Analysis
The better you understand PROG Holdings competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, PROG Holdings' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across PROG Holdings' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
PROG Holdings Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of PROG Holdings Competition
PROG Holdings' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by PROG Holdings in relation to its competition. PROG Holdings' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of PROG Holdings in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact PROG Holdings' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to PROG Holdings, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your PROG Holdings position
In addition to having PROG Holdings in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Small & Mid Caps ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Small & Mid Caps ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Small & Mid Caps ETFs theme has 37 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Small & Mid Caps ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out PROG Holdings Correlation with its peers. For more detail on how to invest in PROG Stock please use our How to Invest in PROG Holdings guide.You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.
Can Consumer Finance industry sustain growth momentum? Does PROG have expansion opportunities? Factors like these will boost the valuation of PROG Holdings. Anticipated expansion of PROG directly elevates investor willingness to pay premium valuations. Determining accurate worth demands scrutiny of both present operating results and projected expansion capacity. Evaluating PROG Holdings demands reviewing these metrics collectively while recognizing certain factors exert disproportionate influence.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.58) | Dividend Share 0.51 | Earnings Share 3.94 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.02) |
Understanding PROG Holdings requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects PROG's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what PROG Holdings' is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Market participants employ diverse analytical approaches to determine fair value and identify buying opportunities when prices dip below calculated worth. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push PROG Holdings' price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between PROG Holdings' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding PROG Holdings should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, PROG Holdings' trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.