Viking Competitors

VIK Stock

45.34 0.43 0.96%

Viking Holdings competes with Evolution Mining, LB Foster, NioCorp Developments, Coupang LLC, and Gap,; as well as few others. The company runs under Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector within Consumer Discretionary industry. Analyzing Viking Holdings competition allows you to expand the diversification possibilities of your existing portfolios and to get a better perspective on locking in new positions. Investors sometimes prefer comparable analysis of Viking Holdings to its intrinsic valuation because they are able to contrast its competitors on a relative basis. Check out Viking Holdings Correlation with its peers.

For more information on how to buy Viking Stock please use our How to buy in Viking Stock guide.

You can use the Comparative Equity Analysis module to analyze the advantages of investing in your portfolio's related equities across multiple sectors and thematic ideas. Please use the input box below to enter symbols for particular investments you would like to analyze. With the equity comparison module, you can estimate the relative effect of Viking Holdings competition on your existing holdings.

Return On Capital Employed is expected to rise to 0.21 this year, although the value of Return On Tangible Assets will most likely fall to (0.23). At this time, Viking Holdings' Total Assets are quite stable compared to the past year. Non Currrent Assets Other is expected to rise to about 138.8 M this year, although the value of Total Current Assets will most likely fall to about 2 B.

Specify up to 10 symbols:

Hype

Prediction

Low	Estimated	High
43.64	45.35	47.06

Details

Intrinsic

Valuation

Low	Real	High
41.79	43.50	49.87

Details

Naive

Forecast

Low	Next	High
42.62	44.33	46.04

Details

11 Analysts

Consensus

Low	Target	High
34.13	37.50	41.63

Details

Viking Holdings Competition Correlation Matrix

Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Viking Holdings and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Viking and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Viking Holdings does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.

	CAHPF	FSTR	NB	CPNG	GAP	WHTGF	PMNXF
CAHPF		0.18	-0.06	0.71	0.15	0.0	0.75	CAHPF
FSTR	0.18		-0.67	0.06	0.2	0.0	-0.2	FSTR
NB	-0.06	-0.67		-0.1	0.07	0.0	0.23	NB
CPNG	0.71	0.06	-0.1		-0.12	0.0	0.57	CPNG
GAP	0.15	0.2	0.07	-0.12		0.0	0.2	GAP
WHTGF	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0		0.0	WHTGF
PMNXF	0.75	-0.2	0.23	0.57	0.2	0.0		PMNXF
	CAHPF	FSTR	NB	CPNG	GAP	WHTGF	PMNXF

Click cells to compare fundamentals

Check Volatility

Backtest Portfolio

High positive correlations

PMNXF	+ 0.75	CAHPF
CPNG	+ 0.71	CAHPF
PMNXF	+ 0.57	CPNG
PMNXF	+ 0.23	NB
GAP	+ 0.2	FSTR
PMNXF	+ 0.2	GAP

High negative correlations

NB	- 0.67	FSTR
PMNXF	- 0.2	FSTR
GAP	- 0.12	CPNG
CPNG	- 0.1	NB
NB	- 0.06	CAHPF
PMNXF	- 0.0	WHTGF

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Viking Stock performing well and Viking Holdings Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Viking Holdings' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

	Mean Deviation	Jensen Alpha	Sortino Ratio	Treynor Ratio	Semi Deviation	Expected Shortfall	Potential Upside	Value @Risk	Maximum Drawdown
CAHPF	2.55	0.20	0.05	0.32	2.75	(3.56)	5.39	(5.43)	21.17
FSTR	2.16	0.47	0.28	0.36	1.60	(2.57)	6.37	(3.40)	14.55
NB	3.49	(0.62)	0.00	(0.74)	0.00	0.00	5.33	(8.00)	28.43
CPNG	1.52	0.18	(0.01)	(0.18)	2.39	(1.73)	4.63	(3.36)	17.75
GAP	2.07	(0.10)	(0.02)	0.05	2.42	(2.36)	4.19	(4.39)	8.64
WHTGF	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
PMNXF	2.48	0.13	(0.02)	(0.06)	3.44	(2.61)	6.32	(5.71)	20.57

Cross Equities Net Income Analysis

Compare Viking Holdings and related stocks such as Evolution Mining, LB Foster, and NioCorp Developments Net Income Over Time

Select Fundamental

	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	2024
FSTR	22.9 M	22.9 M	16.2 M	29.3 M	25.7 M	(44.4 M)	(141.7 M)	4.1 M	(31.2 M)	42.6 M	25.8 M	3.6 M	(45.7 M)	1.5 M	2.3 M
NB	(7.3 M)	(7.3 M)	(7.3 M)	(7.3 M)	(7.3 M)	(7.3 M)	(7.3 M)	(7.3 M)	(7.3 M)	(4 M)	(4.8 M)	(10.9 M)	(40.1 M)	(11.4 M)	(12 M)
CPNG	(1.1 B)	(1.1 B)	(1.1 B)	(1.1 B)	(1.1 B)	(1.1 B)	(1.1 B)	(1.1 B)	(1.1 B)	(696.9 M)	(474.9 M)	(1.5 B)	(92 M)	1.4 B	1.4 B
GAP	27.7 M	833 M	1.1 B	1.3 B	1.3 B	920 M	676 M	848 M	1 B	351 M	(665 M)	256 M	(202 M)	502 M	652 M

Viking Holdings and related stocks such as Evolution Mining, LB Foster, and NioCorp Developments Net Income description

Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Viking Holdings financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Viking Holdings operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.

Viking Holdings Competitive Analysis

The better you understand Viking Holdings competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Viking Holdings' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Viking Holdings' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.

Better Than Average

Worse Than Peers

View Performance Chart

	VIK	CAHPF	FSTR	NB	CPNG	GAP	PMNXF
	0.96 45.34 Viking	1.54 3.30 Evolution	1.94 27.80 FSTR	2.21 1.39 NioCorp	1.33 24.32 Coupang	12.84 24.87 Gap,	2.33 1.76 Perseus
Market Volatility (90 Days Market Risk)	Very steady	Risky	Not too volatile	Unstable	Not too volatile	Not too volatile	Very risky
Market Performance (90 Days Performance)	Solid	OK	Solid	Very Weak	Insignificant	Insignificant	Weak
Odds of Financial Distress (Probability Of Bankruptcy)	Below Average	Low	Very Low	Very High	Very Low	Very Small	Low
Current Valuation (Equity Enterprise Value)	Over Valued	Over Valued	Over Valued	Under Valued	Over Valued	Fairly Valued	Over Valued
Buy or Sell Advice (Average Analysts Consensus)	Strong Buy	Not Available	Hold	Buy	Strong Buy	Buy	Not Available
Trade Advice (90 Days Macroaxis Advice)	Strong Buy	Strong Sell	Strong Buy	Strong Sell	Strong Sell	Cautious Hold	Strong Sell
Current Ratio	N/A	1.17 X	2.06 X	N/A	1.21 X	N/A	3.68 X
Net Asset	8.5 B	6.63 B	313.21 M	20.07 M	13.35 B	11.04 B	1.99 B
Profit Margin	(0.44) %	0.16 %	0.08 %	N/A	0.04 %	0.05 %	0.21 %
EBITDA	(1.11 B)	934.1 M	26.29 M	(7.54 M)	1.25 B	1.17 B	504.39 M
Operating Margin	0.27 %	0.20 %	0.06 %	N/A	0.01 %	0.08 %	0.24 %
Current Valuation	17.57 B	4.57 B	376.41 M	64.42 M	41.95 B	11.86 B	1.85 B
Price To Book	N/A	1.63 X	1.66 X	24.82 X	10.44 X	2.95 X	2.04 X
Retained Earnings	(5.5 B)	N/A	124.63 M	(161.91 M)	(4.38 B)	2.42 B	37 M
Five Year Return	N/A	1.76 %	0.58 %	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Current Asset	N/A	N/A	214.47 M	N/A	N/A	N/A	270 M
Beta	N/A	0.53	0.83	0.27	1.1	2.37	0.89
Number Of Employees	9.5 K	27	1.06 K	7	78 K	85 K	25
Shares Outstanding	303.83 M	1.84 B	10.83 M	42.51 M	1.62 B	375.07 M	1.37 B
Cash Flow From Operations	1.37 B	776.68 M	37.38 M	(11.73 M)	2.65 B	1.53 B	522.91 M
Annual Yield	N/A	0.02 %	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.03 %	0.02 %
Total Debt	6.94 B	1.67 B	67.14 M	7.86 M	2.79 B	5.44 B	72.54 M
Return On Equity	N/A	0.11	0.26	-7.72	0.27	0.3	0.21
Z Score	N/A	1.2	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	14.4
Number Of Shares Shorted	1.6 M	N/A	169.67 K	756.36 K	13.49 M	29.97 M	N/A
Book Value Per Share	(2.74) X	1.77 X	17.06 X	0.03 X	2.33 X	7.71 X	1.08 X
Return On Asset	N/A	0.0497	0.0304	-0.42	0.0152	0.0566	0.1
Current Liabilities	N/A	N/A	91.65 M	N/A	N/A	N/A	111 M
Total Asset	8.5 B	6.63 B	313.21 M	20.07 M	13.35 B	11.04 B	1.99 B
Short Ratio	1.14 X	N/A	4.31 X	6.06 X	2.36 X	4.35 X	N/A
Target Price	37.5	N/A	30.0	8.5	29.27	27.69	N/A
Debt To Equity	N/A	0.57 %	0.64 %	N/A	1.07 %	N/A	0.05 %
Last Dividend Paid	N/A	0.06	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.6	0.025
Shares Owned By Institutions	78.94 %	53.39 %	76.58 %	5.46 %	84.91 %	64.56 %	59.31 %
Market Capitalization	14.1 B	3.95 B	301.08 M	59.09 M	43.75 B	8.36 B	1.81 B
Price To Earning	N/A	10.23 X	46.82 X	N/A	N/A	N/A	23.28 X
Price To Earnings To Growth	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	44.43 X	0.91 X	N/A
Price To Sales	2.86 X	1.73 X	0.56 X	N/A	1.52 X	0.55 X	1.74 X
Net Income	(1.86 B)	323.32 M	1.3 M	(11.9 M)	1.36 B	502 M	233.59 M
Earnings Per Share	(4.84) X	0.12 X	3.87 X	(0.27) X	0.57 X	2.02 X	0.12 X
Shares Owned By Insiders	0.88 %	3.90 %	6.36 %	6.26 %	0.70 %	40.96 %	0.69 %
Revenue	4.71 B	2.06 B	543.74 M	N/A	24.38 B	14.89 B	1.13 B
Working Capital	(2.01 B)	N/A	72.68 M	(9.04 M)	947 M	1.3 B	159 M
Cash And Equivalents	N/A	572.43 M	4.94 M	N/A	3.11 B	N/A	426.85 M
Cash Per Share	N/A	0.31 X	0.45 X	N/A	1.76 X	N/A	0.31 X
Gross Profit	N/A	492.09 M	90.75 M	N/A	4.71 B	6.63 B	564.14 M
Day Typical Price	45.29	3.3	27.5	1.39	24.16	24.67	1.76
Accumulation Distribution	0.0496	N/A	0.0384	0.0355	0.0226	0.1	N/A
Market Facilitation Index	2.3	N/A	1.07	0.05	0.55	2.64	N/A
Daily Balance Of Power	0.187	9.2 T	0.4953	0.6	0.5818	1.07197	9.2 T
Period Momentum Indicator	0.43	0.05	0.53	0.03	0.32	2.83	0.04
Rate Of Daily Change	1.01	1.02	1.02	1.02	1.01	1.13	1.02
Day Median Price	45.26	3.3	27.36	1.39	24.09	24.57	1.76
Price Action Indicator	0.3	0.025	0.71	0.02	0.4	1.72	0.02
Relative Strength Index	80.6	46.44	56.69	29.47	48.48	54.95	52.49
Coefficient Of Variation	385.93	1083.95	423.72	(937.38)	2124.38	3708.27	6842.86
Mean Deviation	1.35	2.55	2.16	3.49	1.52	2.07	2.48
Jensen Alpha	0.3246	0.2042	0.4702	(0.62)	0.1758	(0.1)	0.1257
Total Risk Alpha	0.1821	(0.25)	0.2294	(1.30)	(0.28)	(0.39)	(0.50)
Sortino Ratio	0.2117	0.0526	0.2827	N/A	(0.01)	(0.02)	(0.02)
Downside Variance	2.88	15.11	4.34	N/A	6.37	6.13	16.38
Standard Deviation	1.89	3.64	3.05	4.89	2.45	2.93	3.46
Kurtosis	2.39	1.55	3.32	2.44	6.39	4.73	1.34
Potential Upside	3.23	5.39	6.37	5.33	4.63	4.19	6.32
Treynor Ratio	0.3735	0.3243	0.3582	(0.74)	(0.18)	0.0495	(0.06)
Maximum Drawdown	11.97	21.17	14.55	28.43	17.75	8.64	20.57
Variance	3.57	13.22	9.29	23.88	5.99	8.59	12.0
Market Risk Adjusted Performance	0.3835	0.3343	0.3682	(0.73)	(0.17)	0.0595	(0.05)
Risk Adjusted Performance	0.2047	0.0786	0.1885	(0.07)	0.043	0.0281	0.019
Skewness	0.4582	0.4674	1.44	0.7098	(0.87)	1.22	(0.02)
Semi Deviation	1.25	2.75	1.6	N/A	2.39	2.42	3.44
Information Ratio	0.1899	0.0563	0.1931	(0.13)	(0.01)	(0.02)	(0.02)
Value At Risk	(2.41)	(5.43)	(3.40)	(8.00)	(3.36)	(4.39)	(5.71)
Expected Short fall	(1.56)	(3.56)	(2.57)	N/A	(1.73)	(2.36)	(2.61)
Downside Deviation	1.7	3.89	2.08	N/A	2.52	2.48	4.05
Semi Variance	1.55	7.58	2.55	N/A	5.7	5.87	11.86

Viking Holdings Competition Performance Charts

Five steps to successful analysis of Viking Holdings Competition

Viking Holdings' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Viking Holdings in relation to its competition. Viking Holdings' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:

Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Viking Holdings in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Viking Holdings' competitive landscape.
Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Viking Holdings, and developing a strategy to address them.
Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.

Competitive analysis is an essential tool for businesses to stay ahead of the competition and can be used to inform decision-making and strategy development. By understanding the competitive landscape and staying informed about the activities of competitors, a company can make more informed decisions and improve its overall performance.

Complement your Viking Holdings position

In addition to having Viking Holdings in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run FinTech Thematic Idea Now

FinTech

High long term potential financial entities that are ranging from payment processing, investment management to commercial and investment banking. The FinTech theme has 81 constituents at this time.

You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize FinTech Theme or any other thematic opportunities.

View All Next

Launch

When determining whether Viking Holdings is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Viking Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Viking Holdings Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Viking Holdings Stock:

How To Invest In Viking

Details

Is Viking Stock a good investment?

Details

What is Viking Holdings' Net Worth?

Details

Largest Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines Companies

View

Largest Consumer Services Companies

View

Check out Viking Holdings Correlation with its peers.

For more information on how to buy Viking Stock please use our How to buy in Viking Stock guide.

You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Is Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Viking Holdings. If investors know Viking will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Viking Holdings listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.

Quarterly Earnings Growth

(0.19)

Earnings Share

(4.84)

Revenue Per Share

19.143

Quarterly Revenue Growth

0.091

The market value of Viking Holdings is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Viking that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Viking Holdings' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Viking Holdings' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Viking Holdings' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Viking Holdings' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.

Please note, there is a significant difference between Viking Holdings' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Viking Holdings is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Viking Holdings' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions

Feedback Blog

Made with optimal in San Francisco

2024 Macroaxis LLC

Price To Sales Ratio	Dividend Yield
Ptb Ratio	Days Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per Share	Free Cash Flow Yield
Invested Capital	Operating Cash Flow Per Share
Average Payables	Stock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To Depreciation	Pb Ratio
Ev To Sales	Free Cash Flow Per Share
Roic	Inventory Turnover
Net Income Per Share	Days Of Inventory On Hand
Payables Turnover	Sales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average Inventory	Research And Ddevelopement To Revenue
Capex To Revenue	Cash Per Share
Pocfratio	Interest Coverage
Payout Ratio	Capex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf Ratio	Days Payables Outstanding
Net Current Asset Value	Income Quality
Roe	Tangible Asset Value
Ev To Operating Cash Flow	Pe Ratio
Return On Tangible Assets	Ev To Free Cash Flow
Earnings Yield	Intangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To E B I T D A	Current Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per Share	Receivables Turnover
Graham Number	Shareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To Equity	Capex Per Share
Graham Net Net	Average Receivables
Revenue Per Share	Interest Debt Per Share
Debt To Assets	Enterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Short Term Coverage Ratios	Price Earnings Ratio
Operating Cycle	Price Book Value Ratio
Price Earnings To Growth Ratio	Days Of Payables Outstanding
Dividend Payout Ratio	Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio	Pretax Profit Margin
Ebt Per Ebit	Operating Profit Margin
Effective Tax Rate	Company Equity Multiplier
Long Term Debt To Capitalization	Total Debt To Capitalization
Return On Capital Employed	Debt Equity Ratio
Ebit Per Revenue	Quick Ratio
Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio	Net Income Per E B T
Cash Ratio	Cash Conversion Cycle
Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio	Days Of Inventory Outstanding
Days Of Sales Outstanding	Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Cash Flow Coverage Ratios	Price To Book Ratio
Fixed Asset Turnover	Capital Expenditure Coverage Ratio
Price Cash Flow Ratio	Enterprise Value Multiple
Debt Ratio	Cash Flow To Debt Ratio
Price Sales Ratio	Return On Assets
Asset Turnover	Net Profit Margin
Gross Profit Margin	Price Fair Value
Return On Equity

Viking Competitors

Specify up to 10 symbols:

Viking Holdings Competition Correlation Matrix

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Cross Equities Net Income Analysis

Viking Holdings and related stocks such as Evolution Mining, LB Foster, and NioCorp Developments Net Income description

Viking Holdings Competitive Analysis

Viking Holdings Competition Performance Charts

Five steps to successful analysis of Viking Holdings Competition

Complement your Viking Holdings position

Did You Try This Idea?

Run FinTech Thematic Idea Now

FinTech

COMMON DESTINATIONS

MAIN CATEGORIES

COMPANY