FS Bancorp Competitors

FSBW Stock  USD 41.49  0.49  1.20%   
FSBW conducts business in the Banks sector. FS Bancorp is grouped alongside Timberland Bancorp, Plumas Bancorp, First Bancorp, Citizens Northern, and Waterstone Financial for cross-company financial comparison. Price-to-sales ratios across FS Bancorp's competitors show which names the market values most per dollar of revenue.

Correlation: FS Bancorp vs CoastalSouth Bancshares, Snapshot

Weak diversification
Across the chosen horizon, FS Bancorp and CoastalSouth Bancshares, show a correlation of 0.5 and fall into the Weak diversification bucket. The overlap area shows the portion of risk diversified away by holding both instruments together.
Moving together with FSBW Stock
  0.69BIRG Bank of Ireland Group PLC Earnings Call This WeekPairCorr
  0.86RF Regions FinancialPairCorr
Moving Against FSBW Stock
  0.56BCVN Banque Cantonale VaudoisePairCorr
  0.4CBAPM Commonwealth BankPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Mean reversion analysis in FS Bancorp's involves identifying price extremes that diverge materially from the historical norm. High prices relative to historical norms contrast with unusually low prices, where recovery expectations may emerge. Mean reversion in FS Bancorp is distinct from trend following, which rides momentum rather than betting on reversals.
Sentiment
Range
LowSentimentHigh
39.6841.4643.24
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowIntrinsicHigh
37.3497.2299.00
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
39.2641.0442.82
Details
Analyst
Consensus
LowTargetHigh
41.4145.5050.51
Details
FS Bancorp's financial and valuation profile is evaluated here relative to direct competitors. FS Bancorp's multiples and operating metrics gain context when measured against direct competitors. Growth rates, profitability, and capital efficiency relative to peers frame FS Bancorp's competitive position.

FS Bancorp Competition Correlation Matrix

Reviewing how FS Bancorp moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Evaluating FSBW Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying operating strength versus competitors. Without risk-adjusted context, short-term returns may appear stronger than the volatility required to achieve them would suggest. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

Peer Comparison: Net Income

Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from FS Bancorp's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at FS Bancorp reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.
Compare FS Bancorp and related stocks such as Timberland Bancorp, Plumas Bancorp, and First Bancorp Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental
Price To Sales RatioDividend Yield
Ptb RatioDays Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per ShareFree Cash Flow Yield
Invested CapitalOperating Cash Flow Per Share
Average PayablesStock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To DepreciationPb Ratio
Ev To SalesFree Cash Flow Per Share
RoicInventory Turnover
Net Income Per ShareDays Of Inventory On Hand
Payables TurnoverSales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average InventoryResearch And Ddevelopement To Revenue
Capex To RevenueCash Per Share
PocfratioInterest Coverage
Payout RatioCapex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf RatioDays Payables Outstanding
Net Current Asset ValueIncome Quality
RoeTangible Asset Value
Ev To Operating Cash FlowPe Ratio
Return On Tangible AssetsEv To Free Cash Flow
Earnings YieldIntangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To E B I T D ACurrent Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per ShareReceivables Turnover
Graham NumberShareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To EquityCapex Per Share
Graham Net NetAverage Receivables
Revenue Per ShareInterest Debt Per Share
Debt To AssetsEnterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Short Term Coverage RatiosPrice Earnings Ratio
Operating CyclePrice Book Value Ratio
Price Earnings To Growth RatioDays Of Payables Outstanding
Dividend Payout RatioPrice To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows RatioPretax Profit Margin
Ebt Per EbitOperating Profit Margin
Effective Tax RateCompany Equity Multiplier
Long Term Debt To CapitalizationTotal Debt To Capitalization
Return On Capital EmployedDebt Equity Ratio
Ebit Per RevenueQuick Ratio
Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage RatioNet Income Per E B T
Cash RatioCash Conversion Cycle
Operating Cash Flow Sales RatioDays Of Inventory Outstanding
Days Of Sales OutstandingFree Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Cash Flow Coverage RatiosPrice To Book Ratio
Fixed Asset TurnoverCapital Expenditure Coverage Ratio
Price Cash Flow RatioEnterprise Value Multiple
Debt RatioCash Flow To Debt Ratio
Price Sales RatioReturn On Assets
Asset TurnoverNet Profit Margin
Gross Profit MarginPrice Fair Value
Return On Equity
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
TSBK3.3 M4.6 M4.8 M5.8 M8.3 M10.2 M14.2 M16.7 M24 M24.3 M27.6 M23.6 M27.1 M24.3 M29.2 M33.5 M35.2 M
PLBC2.3 M941 K1.9 M3.4 M4.7 M5.8 M7.5 M8.2 M14 M15.5 M14.5 M21 M26.4 M29.8 M28.6 M29.6 M31.1 M
FNLC2.7 M12.4 M12.7 M13 M14.7 M16.2 M18 M19.6 M23.5 M25.5 M27.1 M36.3 M39 M29.5 M27 M34.4 M36.1 M
CZNC7.5 M23.4 M22.7 M18.6 M17.1 M16.5 M15.8 M13.4 M22 M19.5 M19.2 M30.6 M26.6 M24.1 M26 M23.4 M16.1 M
WSBF5.3 M-7.5 M34.9 M14.7 M12.7 M16.6 M25.5 M26 M30.8 M35.9 M81.1 M70.8 M19.5 M9.4 M18.7 M26.4 M18.6 M
CBAN2.1 M2.5 M2.6 M4.6 M7.5 M8.4 M8.7 M7.8 M11.9 M10.2 M11.8 M18.7 M19.5 M21.7 M23.9 M28.3 M29.7 M
BCML-732 K7.3 M2.2 M2.7 M5.2 M7.5 M5.9 M5.3 M14.5 M17.3 M13.7 M20.7 M23.7 M27.4 M23.6 M23.9 M25.1 M
PCB-968.3 K841.7 KM21.4 M11.8 M12.2 M14 M16.4 M24.3 M24.1 M16.2 M40.1 M35 M30.7 M25.8 M37.5 M39.3 M
CZFS2.4 M12.8 M14.2 M13.4 M13.4 M11.6 M12.6 M13 M18 M19.5 M25.1 M29.1 M29.1 M17.8 M27.8 M36.6 M38.4 M

FS Bancorp Competitive Analysis

Sizing up FS Bancorp against Timberland Bancorp, Plumas Bancorp, and First Bancorp reveals meaningful differences in scale and efficiency. At a 311.2 M valuation, FS Bancorp brings in 217.5 M on the top line. The company converts revenue to profit at a 23.02% rate and delivers 10.82% on shareholder equity. The market prices Timberland Bancorp more richly at 10.80x earnings, while FS Bancorp trades at 3.24x. Revenue tilts toward FS Bancorp at 217.5 M compared with 108.2 M. First Bancorp keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 37.83% margin versus 23.02% at FS Bancorp.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
FSBW TSBK PLBC FNLC CZNC WSBF CBAN
 1.20 
41.49
FSBW
 0.27 
40.65
Timberland
 0.89 
51.25
Plumas
 0.17 
29.05
First
 0.57 
23.13
Citizens
 0.33 
17.91
Waterstone
 0.45 
19.89
Colony
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Five Year Return
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Trailing Beta
Return On Asset
Number Of Shares Shorted
Book Value Per Share
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Short Ratio
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
Price To Earnings
Market Capitalization
Price To Earnings To Growth
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

FS Bancorp Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze FS Bancorp Against Peers

FS Bancorp's peer analysis compares FS Bancorp with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether FS Bancorp trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where FS Bancorp leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Dividend growth at FS Bancorp has outpaced most competitors, suggesting management sees durable cash flow ahead. Two companies in the same sector can have very different risk profiles once you look past revenue size. Competition analysis is informative when price, margins, leverage, and growth are read together. For peer comparison, FS Bancorp has a market cap of 311.24 M, P/E of 3.24, profit margin of 23.02%.

FS Bancorp data is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Analyst inputs may be included when coverage is available.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Vlad Skutelnik, Macroaxis Contributor